Author: tworuru

  • Pivot to video

    Pivot to video

    Thanks so much for the incredible response to my previous newsletter. People wrote a lot of very kind and thoughtful emails and comments; I think I’ve managed to respond to most of them, and some of them are so insightful that I’ll be spotlighting them in an upcoming edition. So here we are, a week later — using the most flexible possible definition of a week1 — and, as promised, I have a new newsletter, and an update on what I think the Cynic’s Guide to Self-Improvement will become.

    The short version is: I’ve started making video essays.

    Here’s a bit more “why.”

    I started this project in the hope that cracking the self-improvement code would give me the power to get more stuff made. I wanted to make several kinds of things: fiction; and non-fiction columns, essays and features — the kind of thing I used to write for media. I also wanted to make art, and videos of me making the art. And while it’s true that all that is a redonkulous workload, and probably impossible, it’s also very true that I spent a lot of time avoiding doing any of it, mainly by reading and scrolling life away on my phone.

    I have managed to write a lot of self-improvement articles! But that isn’t all I wanted to make. And, on another selfish note, the move away from Substack that I made for personal morality reasons has completely munted my subscriber growth. My subscriber numbers have been static or diminishing slightly for months now. Substack has a semi-decent recommendation engine that was my main source of subs, and while it is flawed — a lot of subs are spammy, and they recommended a Nazi newsletter the other day! — it was something.

    I’ve been mentally wrassling with all this for months now. Some time ago whilst scrolling, I came across a timely YouTube video essay which was about why you should make YouTube videos and was set entirely to gameplay footage of Sonic the Hedgehog 1.2

    This fascinated me, because the essay was very well written and the visuals — while compelling — were completely tangential to the video.

    This last part was the most important. I’d made quite a few art videos in the past, but they were always mostly about the art I was making. I’d found this restrictive as well as time-consuming. Now I realised: I could make art videos that were not actually or only tangentially about the art; where the visuals of painting just served as an interesting backdrop for the content I wanted to make anyway.

    Essays like this one.

    There’s another factor at play. The event I hinted at in my last newsletter is this: My day job, in the tech industry, is finished. And while I’m actively looking for another job, either in or out of the tech industry3, I would very very very very very much like for a decent proportion of my income — ideally all of it — to come from the art I make, or things related to that art. Yes, this is another lofty goal. But people achieve it all the time! I know a number of full-time, non-starving artists, as well as quite a few who make a living from their newsletters. Why don’t we have both?

    Summed up:

    • I need income from art/writing stuff
    • I can’t have that without a following
    • One of the best ways to get a following is to play the content game.

    Which brings me to this video that I’ve spent quite a lot of time making. The other half of the project is explained there. I’m calling it “Everybob.” That should make sense once you watch the video.

    Astute readers will realise that you have not actually seen this so-far mythical video, or a link to it. Well, if you’ve read this far, chances are you have the attention span for what I’m about to ask. Sneakily, all the text above — in addition to being fascinating — is serving as a gatekeeper for skimmers. And I can’t have readers watching the video for thirty seconds and then clicking away. Can’t embed it here either. The Algorithm will punish me for that. It is a cruel master, but we all serve at its whim. If you want to watch the video — and it’s fine if you don’t, but significantly finer if you do — it would help me enormously if you did the following. Click on the upcoming thumbnail image, which will take you to my channel page, and click/tap on the video to start playing it, then, in diminishing order of importance:

    • Watch it all the way through
    • Leave a Like
    • Leave a comment
    • Subscribe to the YouTube channel
    • Share the video with at least one friend who you think will like it enough to watch it through to the end, or one enemy who will hate it so much they watch it through to the end.

    For all the reverential talk about the Algorithm, it isn’t black magic; fundamentally, it rewards videos that get watched all the way through to the end and that get engaged with. That’s it. The only place luck comes in to it is with the initial crop of people the video gets shown to. If you wonderful people, my real subscribers, can signal to YouTube that people will watch my video, there’s actually a very good chance that the Algorithm picks it up and shows it to many many more.

    Whew. Nervous. Here’s the link to my channel page. If you’re keen to help out, watch the video through to the end (important!) and let me know what you reckon in the YouTube comments.

    Don’t worry! This isn’t going to become a newsletter where all I do is urge you to watch my videos. If anything, it’s the opposite; the videos exist so hopefully more people will find my writing. Instead of asking viewers to Like and Subscribe in the traditional way to you my video content, I’ll be asking them to Subscribe (For Real) to my newsletter. Think of the videos as another medium, as way of watching or listening to the newsletter content, at your leisure. And subscribers will get early access to the vids, behind-the-scenes content, and they’ll often get to read the actual essays before they become video essays.

    Oh, and if you want to support my work by becoming a paid subscriber, that would be absolutely mint — not just because paid support is going to be extremely personally helpful, but because I’m finally going to start offering some proper benefits to paid subscribers.

    If you’re a paid sub, look for something special in your inbox soon.

    Subscribe now – pay whatever amount you want!

    There’s a lot more I’ve got planned and ready to go, but that can wait for next time. Thanks, as always, for reading.

    And as of now, thanks for watching as well.

    Another shout-out: If you have any jobs that need doing, or know of jobs going, just hit reply and let me know. Likewise, if you’d like to commission a or buy a painting (examples of the sort of stuff I can do are in the video!) now would be a really good time to do that — just hit reply. And feel free to get in touch if for no other reason that you feel like it; I like reading your replies.

    Also, comments are back! And they’re on a website I own and control so they’re never going away again. You can make a comment right here, just below the footnotes 🙂

    1. It’s 11 days later, but we’re still technically in the week following the week where I wrote the last newsletter. Unless you believe that the next week starts on a Sunday, which it absolutely does not. Blame ISO8601 if you don’t like it; I don’t make the rules.
    2. It’s well worth a watch!
    3. Hit me up if you know of anything going! I’m going to do an online CV kind of thing soon but for now know my skill-set is comms, marketing, and most things relating to those areas.
  • Life, the Universe, and

    Life, the Universe, and

    I had a birthday the other week. The numbers are starting to run together but this one is special because it’s 42. If you know, you know. (I suspect quite a few of you do; even the title of this newsletter is a riff on what you know it is).

    As befits the number, it was an ordinary birthday. I mostly got books — well, money, which I spent on books. I went for a walk in a wetland with my son. We got a curry. There was a thoughtful, bird-themed cake made by my wife — as in, stuck to the icing was a piece of paper on which was written the word BIRDS in permanent marker.

    If there is a lesson to be taken from a nondescript number attached to an arbitrary date, it’s that much of what makes life meaningful is ordinary, and given the seeming rarity and sparseness of life in the Universe, it’s extraordinary that we live at all. That some of us have lives of (sometimes relative) comfort and joy may seem unfair, but it’s also a reminder that with great privilege, comes great responsibility.

    A chocolate cake covered in raspberry icing and candles, with a piece of paper stuck to it that has the word "birds" written on it in permanent marker. Three smaller sketchy birds are visible to the right on the paper.

    The Big Tree

    My son likes things that happen reliably; they lend form to the world, make it make sense. One of these is an enormous, gnarled, and quite dead pine tree that stands about halfway between our town and the relatively bustling cosmopolitan metropolis of Hamilton. “Here comes the Big Tree!” he would exclaim, in one of his first full, non-scripted sentences.

    I also like the Big Tree. I have always meant to take a photo of it. There is something about way it stands stark in the paddocks against the sky, shedding bent limbs, leaning a little more precariously each time we drive past it. I’ve been doing that for years, each time thinking “I should take that picture, it’ll fall down soon.” But it is in a tricky location, on a corner. I’d have to park the car on the verge a few hundred metres away and walk up to the fence line. Hardly insurmountable, but just enough of a barrier to stop me. Once we thought it had fallen down, but we’d just been distracted and looking in the wrong place for just one journey; our son eventually corrected us on a later trip. This was a shock, a sign that I’d better take that photo soon.

    A few weeks ago, the Aurora Australis flared on a reasonably clear night. It was the perfect chance to grab the best possible picture of the thing. Silhouetted by the dark hills, lit by the glow of stars, Southern Lights and passing cars. It would be epic. I got my DSLR ready and didn’t go. It was cold. I was tired. Not absurdly so, but you know.

    A few days later there was a storm and the big tree fell down. I will never have that picture; I never even snapped one on my phone as we went past. Leo calls it out each time we drive past. “That’s the place where big tree falled down,” he says. “Big tree’s gone now.”

    Dead wood

    I planted some citrus trees several months ago. They’re doing all right, thanks to a climate that renders citrus unkillable by even the worst gardener. One even has limes growing. To plant them I had to dig up some stumps and hack at some unsightly camellias. I made a pile of the dead branches and stumps that I would take take to our green waste bin, which we pay to be emptied each month. Often it gets emptied empty.

    Each morning I make coffee, breakfast, and lunch for Leo, and look out on the back yard where the dead wood is and realise I’ve forgotten to take it to the green waste bin. And each day I remind myself that I really must take the wood to the green waste bin and then I forget to take the wood to the green waste bin.

    The other morning I looked out at the dead wood and felt that familiar clout of guilt, the one-two punch of “I’ve forgotten to do something” and then the numbing balm of some helpfully unhelpful subconscious subsystem coming online to take away the shame of forgetting to take the dead wood to the green waste bin, by… making me forget about the dead wood that I need to take to the green waste bin.

    Then I saw the birds. Sparrows, chaffinches, silvereyes, fantails. They were flocking to the dead wood, hopping all over it, feasting on the insects, rubbing their beaks on the bark, scolding and flitting and swooping as tiny birds do. It was a cold, misty morning; the dead wood was their haven and playground. There were at least twenty. They moved around too much and too fast for me to get a good count.

    I heard them piping their ineffable songs and felt less bad about the dead wood for the moment. I figured I would write about it, then just kind of didn’t for multiple weeks.

    Now I have.

    The wood is still there.

    A tweet from a Twitter user called Evan DeSimone, @smorgasboredom. He writes, "Every time we're forced to talk about Joe Rogan, I am reminded of my best and most immutable axiom. Nothing that only men like is cool." In a second tweet he says, "Everyone is mad about this so let me just clarify that I'm 100% correct."
    It’s true, though

    Those might have been metaphors, who knows

    For all of my adult life and quite a long time before that, I wanted to understand why I don’t do the things I want to do. Or, more worryingly, why I don’t do the things I need to do. Why I struggle so mightily with such inscrutable inertia. All I ever really wanted was to make things I liked making, regularly enough to earn a living from making the things I like making. Books, mainly; I want(ed) to write, both fiction and non. But also art. Comics. Paintings and whatnot. Artifacts, I suppose.

    I found out some of the why. I am autistic. I have ADHD. It’s like the Two Wolves meme, if it were real, which it is not. Unfortunately I don’t really get to choose which one I feed. They share the same stomach; they’re both me.

    I always assumed knowing the “why” would unlock the “how.” That it would be my spider bite. If you are a regular reader of my irregular newsletter, you will know this is not the case. Some days I think knowing why is helpful, or a kind of comfort. Other days I just feel like diagnosis is a box containing infinite smaller boxes, also labelled “why.”

    A freeze frame of the spider biting high school student Peter Parker from the film The Amazing Spider-Man

    The spider bite

    You might have heard this story if you’re alive and have either the ability to hear, to see, or both. There is a high school student. He is bitten by a magical spider (don’t quibble, I know the story, but face it: it’s magic.) The spider bite confers upon him tangentially spider-related powers. He is very strong and very coordinated and very alert. It is everything he ever wanted. He does a cool parkour thing on the way down the stairs to have breakfast with his adoptive aunt and uncle.

    We want self-improvement to be our own spider bite. We all long for a one thing that will give us or unlock in us what we’ve always wanted to do or be. While we all know there’s no such thing as magic, obviously good things take time, but it’s the unlocking that’s the point. The spider-dam will burst and our inner spiders will pour forth. We’ll finally be able to write the 400 words nearly every day we’ve been promising ourselves we’ll write since 2004.

    With each self-help book consumed this doesn’t happen, so we read a new one.

    “This one,” we think, “this one will be the magic spider.”

    Unfortunately spiders are not magic and when they bite you it tends to fester.

    I thought that writing about self-improvement might unlock some self-improvement. 🎵 Spider-bite, spider-bite. All I want is a spider-bite. 🎶 I’ve been doing this for some years now and I can’t honestly say if it has helped. I take cold showers. I like it. I’m reasonably fit for a bloke of 42. I can play with the kids and not puff when I take the boy to school on the bike. Those are good things. But as for the self-improvement: to what end was it? Did I need to read books to know that I should exercise and eat good food and that if I do things regularly, things would get done?

    I did not. But I did want to feel less alone in the struggle to do simple things that are not easy, and to believe that change might be possible despite what seems like a lifetime of evidence that it’s not.

    A couple of weeks ago a media outlet got in touch asking me if I wanted to write something about self-help. Surprisingly, I did. It feels like a fitting coda to The Cynic’s Guide to Self-Improvement — or, tantalisingly, a reset.

    Here it is at The Spinoff. Go give it a hoon.

    Everything

    This project, the one you’re reading, isn’t over. But it is changing. I feel tapped out on self-improvement, if for no other reason that the books are incredibly boring and often — when you’ve read as many as I have — very depressing.1

    As I’ve written in the above article, reading is certainly a way to be thinking, but it’s a terrible way to be doing. So I’m changing the project to have just one goal: make something and get it out each week. When I am honest with myself, the main form of self-improvement I want to achieve is that long-elusive consistency. And I think I’ve hit on a way to do this that encompasses a bunch of my other interests — chiefly art, art education, and making silly videos — and broadens a focus that I feel has become myopic and cloying.

    If you’ll allow me to paraphrase three years of this project and however much self-improvement consumption before that, nearly every book renders down to regularly do something that is hard but helpful.

    And that is the Cynic’s Guide to Self-Improvement.

    I’ll have something new for you next week.

    Do me a solid? I would love to know if this newsletter has helped you in any way, however arcane or tangential. This is a bit of a selfish request, but it’d be quite lovely to hear some nice stuff around now. You can reply to this email, or if you’re reading this on my site, you can leave a comment. Thanks so much.

    1. There is some other Life Stuff going on (don’t worry, we’re ok) which I can’t really talk about at the moment, but which has also had an impact.
  • Taxpayers’ Union pet policy to cost taxpayers billions, again

    Taxpayers’ Union pet policy to cost taxpayers billions, again

    I did not want to take this newsletter out of hiatus. I really didn’t! I have my kids to look after, I have projects to do, I have lawns to mow. As I write this my absurdly cute 8 month old daughter is chasing my laptop around the house, as she has picked today to learn how to crawl. As much as I’d like to I do not have time to fish around in the incredibly depressing minutia of New Zealand’s one-degree-of-separation think-tank powered politics.

    But I have to, because the think tanks are at it again, and somehow the media is mostly neglecting to mention it.

    In its latest deeply neoliberal austerity Budget, the Government has managed to find billions – potentially tens of billions, or more – for big businesses, in the form of capital expensing. As usual all this is hidden behind frustrating obfuscatory language, but what it means is that if you’re a mining company that wants to buy the Leveller from Fern Gully you can now claim 20 percent off the cost of the thing upfront, against the taxes you’d otherwise have paid. Tax deductions for depreciation already existed, of course, but depreciation is a recognition that things slowly break down and have to be fixed or replaced and this costs businesses money – as time passes. Capital expensing is going “oh, this would have broken or worn out at some point in the future, so look, why don’t we just kind of buy a bunch of it for you?” And that I suppose is fine if you’re a small or medium business. The issue here is that – as per Marc Daalder’s excellent reporting – there appears to be no limit to how much this misbegotten corporate tonguing will cost the country which means that we’ll soon start subsidising, oh I don’t know, oil rigs.

    This is largely the result of months of Taxpayers’ Union lobbying. They’ve been in the ears of MPs, sending them asinine “briefing papers” (their latest is a frothing neoliberal wet dream dripping with outright disinformation about government debt1 that can be summed up by the words “PRIVATISE EVERYTHING”; naturally, it landed TPU Executive Director Jordan Williams a spot on 3 News). They then spruik these efforts in their horrible newsletters that go out to all their members and anyone who thought they were getting a Ratepayer’s Report from Stuff, and in these missives they meticulously document their policy and public discourse wins.

    an excerpt from one of the TPU's nightmare newsletters that reads: Our number one policy we’ve been pushing for in this year’s Budget to boost productivity and New Zealand’s long-term prosperity is full capital expensing.  Back in March, we published a paper and launched our campaign to make the case for allowing businesses to immediately write off the cost of new equipment, machinery, and technology, rather than spreading the deduction over years under complex depreciation schedules. This policy has been successfully implemented in the United States and the United Kingdom, driving economic growth and productivity. Bang for buck, the economic literature suggests it’s the best form of tax relief in terms of growing the economic pie.  Yesterday, Mike Hosking picked up Nick Stewart’s Hawke’s Bay Today op-ed on capital expensing. Nick is a longtime supporter of the Taxpayers’ Union, and said the opinion piece is a direct result of our paper and campaign. I’ve copied the op-ed below (it’s behind the NZ Herald paywall).   Christopher Luxon’s answer to Mike Hosking’s question on whether this week’s Budget contains full capital expensing is encouraging. Have a listen and judge for yourself.  That wasn't the only part of our Go for Growth briefing paper series that is getting media attention.
    You are reading an excerpt from a Taxpayers’ Union newsletter. Roll 10d12 psychic damage.

    The TPU’s position was for full capital expensing; that the government should rebate the total cost of the Leveller, not just 20 percent of it. They are calling the upfront rebate – which is, to reiterate, a gigantic sweetheart deal, just imagine if you could write off 20 percent of a shiny new flatscreen TV against your next tax bill! – a flop.

    This is posturing. For the TPU and its junk-tank Atlas Network fellow travellers like the New Zealand Initiative, anything other than total victory will always be a flop, and for them total victory would be the government abolishing all taxes and public services, and ceding sovereignty to a consortium of noble captains of industry. They will be privately pleased with the developments in this miserable budget. For them, they represent progress. What bothers me, as always, is that these groups are deeply entrenched in business, media and Government decision making; their policy prescriptions are often picked up either piecemeal or wholesale, and despite this (or because of it) the media tends to take their pronouncements about fiscal responsibility at face value while ignoring the catastrophic cost of the policies they’ve advocated for.

    Let’s recap some of those, shall we? Before the latest boondoggle, the TPU took full credit for torching Labour’s 3 Waters, legislation that aimed to take the (very high) capital costs of water infrastructure off ratepayers and on to Government books. Achieved through a racist whataboutism campaign aimed at Maori, the TPU’s successful campaign meant that many councils were forced to massively hike rates to pay for their decaying infrastructure instead of handing it off to Government. Thanks for the enormous tax hike, Taxpayers’ Union!

    Before this, the TPU embedded their chair Casey Costello – also formerly an Act party candidate – on the NZ First party list. Upon her election to Parliament, she immediately set out doing practically everything the TPU (and NZI) had lobbied for around tobacco policy; scrapping world-first tobacco legislation, cancelling excise tax increases on tobacco products, and purchasing vapes from tobacco companies to hand out to smokers – policies that came out of mysterious anonymous briefing papers that spontaneously manifested on her desk. The cost of the thwarted and introduced policies once again runs into the billions; the cost of healthcare for smokers, the lost revenue from excise taxes, the subsidies for the tobacco industry’s addictive, environmentally ruinous products, and the deaths of an estimated 5000 New Zealanders each year.

    Some media, to their credit, tried to identify links between the TPU and Costello, despite widespread and illegal stonewalling. But in doggedly searching for or turning up the usual paper trails – names on briefing papers, emails, overt commonalities between Costello’s mysterious documents and tobacco industry propaganda – they missed the wood for the trees. Costello is the Taxpayers’ Union! She stepped down as chair of the TPU to be parachuted into a job as an MP, doing many of the exact things the TPU advocated for during her tenure as chair, and once she finishes her catastrophic innings, she’ll be launched right back into the loving arms of some cosy industry body or lobby group. This is New Zealand politics; everyone knows everyone else, and they all gets a sweet job after their time in the trenches is up. (The media are not exempt from the merry-go-round; political journalism is practically a job interview for the job of a party comms person or corporate executive. If you’ve ever questioned the weirdly out-of-touch, navel-gazing, anodyne, optics-obsessed quality of the Labour party’s public statements, you will find your answer in the fact that a chunk of their comms team consists of ex-Press Gallery journalists.)

    Given the state of things, it is probably folly for me to beg the media to make the link between the think tanks, the ruinous policy they so successfully advocate for, and the resultant costs to the country – or, to put it another way, the cost to taxpayers. But I’m going to do it anyway. The Taxpayers Union, NZI, and others dress up their advocacy for greater corporate control of the commons in the language of freedom and choice. They are frequently platformed and even embedded in our media, often for sneering at public projects like overly-expensive playgrounds or a set of steps at a beach. But these so-called blowouts pale in comparison to the multiple billions the policies championed by the TPU and their ilk cost the country as a whole. The least the media could do is tell the other side of the story: the outsize effect that these groups have on the formulation of public policy, and the catastrophic cost of those efforts to all New Zealanders.

    1. The report makes the case that the Government’s debt is both unsustainable and like a household’s, a nonsense which is still repeated ad nauseam by political and financial reporters. Verity Johnson’s excellent op-ed makes short work of this absurd claim. ↩︎

    Comments

    Join the conversation on Bluesky

    1. Dylan Reeve
      Dylan Reeve @dylanreeve.com

      You misunderstand the TPU. It is not the Taxpayers’ Union, it is the Taxpayer’s Union. It claims to be the former, but that’s not really true. They don’t represent the interests of Taxpayers (collective group), they represent the interests of Taxpayers (individuals)

      May 24, 2025
      1. Dylan Reeve
        Dylan Reeve @dylanreeve.com

        So the fact that a benefit to some (individual) Taxpayers may result in a negative impact for (collective) Taxpayers is consistent with their aims. The exception to this is when they can claim to represent (collective) Taxpayers in attacking small value arts funding on ideological grounds.

        May 24, 2025
        1. Josh | writer, painter, tinkerer
          Josh | writer, painter, tinkerer @tworuru.com

          God I’ve put the apostrophe in the wrong place everywhere haven’t I

          May 24, 2025
          1. Dylan Reeve
            Dylan Reeve @dylanreeve.com

            You seem to have put it in the place they claim it belongs.

            May 24, 2025
            1. Josh | writer, painter, tinkerer
              Josh | writer, painter, tinkerer @tworuru.com

              Love it when a typo accidentally tells the truth

              May 24, 2025
  • Your phone is the mind-killer

    Your phone is the mind-killer

    Today’s TLDR

    • Yes, the medium is the message, and it might be rewiring your brain
    • If digital media modes are leaking into your meatspace, try putting the phone down
    • Litany Against Smartphones
    • Unlike, Unsubscribe

    I am here, in my mode

    There’s a thing called Tetris Syndrome I think I’ve remarked on before; essentially it’s that thing where if you spend all day playing a videogame you’ll keep seeing it when you shut your eyes. I get the same thing, but for books; if I read something compelling enough I spend the next while hearing my inner dialogue as if narrated by the author. I assume this happens to other people, although when I’ve mentioned it to other people I’ve weathered a brief stare followed by a quick subject-change. It can be like time-travel, especially if you’re reading Austen or O’Brien or something in similar prose.

    It happens with other media as well. I know that if I spent too long – any amount of time, really – on Twitter or the increasingly Twitter-like Bluesky, I start to think in terms of tweets, replies, the omnipresent strident snark, witticisms I could render into Tweetish form (which I would get oh so many likes and reposts for). This is as horrible as it sounds. Lately, I have been wondering if something similar happens with all our regular digital diets and interactions.

    Medium, meet message

    If you did media studies or similar you may have come across the theories/ramblings of a bloke called Marshall McLuhan who is remembered today for coining “the medium is the message,” a tricky little phrase that essentially means that the meaning of a piece of media is inextricable from the way it’s delivered. A letter has a different vibe – and a different effect – to newsprint which is different to a movie which is different to TV which is different to hypertext on a computer screen which is different to the endless algorithmic scroll of TikTok on an iPhone.

    McLuhan’s mostly impenetrable but prescient guff came to mind again when I went to Bluesky to try to copy my username and accidentally found myself scrolling for what was probably only a few minutes. Afterward, I felt the echoes of the online conversations I’d glanced at for hours.

    (And even now I feel a silent urge emanating from the smartphone within eyeshot. It’s like having a Tamagotchi, except it waterboards you every time you pick it up.)

    My contention is that the mediums of modern information delivery – hypertext, email, algorithmic scrolling, doomscrolling – are modulating how we think, act and react to things in the non-digital realm; if you find yourself absently composing tweets while you’re doing the dishes, mentally framing conversation as comments, or ruminating about something you read on that curiously addictive gossip site before realising you’ve got no idea why you walked into the kitchen, this could be why. This isn’t an original idea; it’s essentially what authors like Johann Hari are on about with the likes of Stolen Focus, but if I pay attention I can quite definitely feel it happening, live, in my day-to-day.

    O rly?

    My anecdote is one thing, but actual evidence for this specific effect is harder to come by. My research well ran dry on this one (perhaps readers can help) but there’s enough here to put a glaze on my half-baked theory. For instance, there a psychology paper called “Linguistic Style Matching in Social Interaction,” about “the psychometric properties of language in dyadic interactions” which makes me think of researchers trying to talk to oak trees. But of course that’s a dryad; a dyad is a sociological term for the smallest possible group of people – a pair. This, and other research, shows linguistic style matching or interactive alignment; essentially that two people talking together start talking like each other.

    In this scheme, two interlocutors simultaneously align their representations at different linguistic levels and do so by imitating each other’s choices of speech sounds, grammatical forms, words and meanings. For example, if Peter says to Mary with reference to their child, I handed John his lunch box today,’ Mary is more likely to respond with And I handed him his coat’ than with And I gave him his coat’ even though the two alternative responses have equivalent meaning.

    This lines up with our understanding of how human interaction works. It’s like accents. If you hang around French people for some reason, you will start to sound French. It makes sense that it would happen to some extent for reading – and doomscrolling. Perhaps the medium really is the message, and it’s hacking (apart) our brains.

    I’m not sure how to fix that, but here’s one idea.

    Litany against phones

    I rewatched Dune: Part 2, helped by my wife who requested frequent pauses to explain some arcane facet of Dune-lore. I’ve only read the first three books – the Dune sequence is occasionally and accurately referred to “Diminishing Returns: The Series” or “Stop With The First One” but I’ve read enough fan-wiki summaries to handle the questions. Dune is gloriously dense and weird, and the movies have done a good job of retaining the vast sense of scale and strangeness of the books while shedding some of Old Man Herbert’s unnecessary authorial foibles, like his virulent homophobia.

    One of the better things from the books that it’s hard to render into film, though, is the mentally-recited Litany Against Fear, which is exactly what it sounds like.

    I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.

    Not only is it a neat bit of prose, it’s psychologically helpful – this is honestly a pretty good way to deal with anxiety for many: recognise the feeling, but don’t fight it, knowing that it will pass in time. I also like that it’s endlessly adaptable. Modern problems require modern solutions, so here is my version.

    “I must not scroll. Smartphones are the mind-killer. TikTok is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will put down my smartphone. I will permit it to pass into a different room. And when it is gone I will turn the inner eye to something else. When the phone has gone, only time will remain.”

    Todo

    If there is something you need to get done and you feel goofy resorting to the Litany Against Phones, here’s an alternative:

    Go back to the early 90s.

    1. Turn off your phone notifications except for calls and turn the ringer volume up
    2. Put your phone in a different room
    3. Plug it in. Tell yourself (about to show my age here) that it’s connected to the wall with a curly cord and you can’t disconnect it until you’ve done the thing you need to do.
    4. Do the thing. If the phone rings, and it probably won’t, you’ll hear it.

    Dislike & Unsubscribe

    If you’d like to support the newsletter, please do! You now have more support options:

    Thanks for hanging about. For better or worse, there’s more where this came from.

    — Josh


  • this is a test to see if my posse setup is working

  • Cat painting

    Cat painting

    This is a picture I painted of my cat Bianca, who died in 2023. I’d always wanted to try painting something photorealistic. Now I’ve done it and I never want to paint something photorealistic ever again. I wrote about the painting (and the cat) at some length, here. The painting took me about six years to finish, and the story is a weird mixture of how determined I can be to see something through while simultaneously not doing a goddamn thing to actually make progress. And yet, here she is.

    A picture of a photorealistic painting of a very pretty kitty cat.
  • Cakeburger

    Cakeburger

    Cakeburger is/was a webcomic I made that was sporadically updated at best. I think the reason for inconsistency was twofold: I never quite figured out what I wanted it to be and I’m just not that good at making comics. There are some good ones there, and I’m going to leave the site up for now because I still think “Cakeburger” is a great name, some of the comics still make me chuckle, and there are ideas I’d like to tackle one day, but for now it’s probably best to think of this project as on permanent hiatus.

    Visit Cakeburger and read the ancient comics

    A snake gives a rat a friendly snake hug
  • Bored Ape Painting Club

    Bored Ape Painting Club

    I’m not a developer and yet I keep running into things that need development, and yet I have no money to pay developers. It’s all very annoying. When I started work the wildly over-engineered Bird Hat Grift Club I found that rare thing, a dev who was happy to accept payment in painting form. So I painted a Bored Ape for him.

    I haven’t made prints of this but if you want one for some reason, email me.

  • Luxon saga

    Luxon saga

    I painted a picture of the New Zealand Prime Minister and tried to sell it on TradeMe. A few days before the auction ended it got banned. This caused a mini-Streisand and the painting got a lot of attention. I censored it and listed it on TradeMe again. This time it sold successfully. Together, the new owners and I collaborated to do a live gallery unveiling where I also uncensored the painting, restoring its original glorious form.

    I didn’t make prints of this because I didn’t feel the world needed more of this painting in it. In the unlikely event that you want one, email me.

    a completely beautiful and highly photorealistic portrait of new zealand's wonderful prime minister christopher luxon
  • The Department of Biological Determinism

    The Department of Biological Determinism

    This is a short story set in the world of Harry Potter. Any questions sparked by that sentence, like “why?” and “no, seriously, after everything JKR has said and done… why? are, I’m afraid, best answered by reading the the fanfic. I know that the words “fanfic” and “Harry Potter” are enough to create a near-impenetrable resistance to clicking links or reading further, but seriously, if you like any of my work, just read:

    The Department of Biological Determinism

    (The story is hosted at Archive Of Our Own for not-getting-sued-into-oblivion reasons.)

    A quote from 'The Department of Biological Determinism' that says "She felt what it was like to be so sure, so convinced of her own rightness, that right turned around on itself and came back wrong"